Laserfiche WebLink
ENGINEERING FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR CORRECTIVE ACTION <br /> CORRAL HOLLOW SANITARY LANDFILL <br /> SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY,CALIFORNIA <br /> EXECUTIVE SUMMARY <br /> This Engineering Feasibility Study (EFS) for Corrective Action was completed to help <br /> determine an appropriate response to impacted groundwater conditions that have been <br /> identified at the Corral Hollow Sanitary Landfill (CHSL). This study was prepared In <br /> accordance with California Code of Regulations Title 27, Section 20420, and a letter <br /> submitted by the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board dated July 7, 2011 <br /> This EFS specifically recommends a proposed Corrective Action Program (CAP) to address <br /> volatile organic compound (VOC) impacts to groundwater in the identified release area. The <br /> EFS includes a summary of site conditions, identification of available remedial alternatives, <br /> preliminary screening to identify viable alternatives, definition of treatment system <br /> components and costs, and a technical/cost evaluation to identify the merits and limitations <br /> of the remedial alternatives. <br /> The EFS considers potential remedial alternatives, including source controls, and in-situ and <br /> ex-situ remedial technologies to address groundwater impacts. A total of six technologies <br /> ® were identified as being potentially viable at the site. Technically viable treatment <br /> technologies include: <br /> • Source control through extension of the final cover system; <br /> • Source control through expansion of the landfill gas extraction system; <br /> • Injected air sparging combined with vapor extraction; <br /> • Intrinsic remediation; <br /> • Groundwater extraction and treatment by air stripping; and <br /> • Groundwater extraction and treatment by granular activated carbon adsorption. <br /> After defining the system components and costs, the EFS evaluated the merits and <br /> limitations of each technology. Capital costs for the six remedial technologies ranged from <br /> about$9,500 to$1,386,000. <br /> Based on the technical/cost evaluation and findings from the recent Evaluation Monitoring <br /> Program (EMP) field investigation (GLA, 2012), it is concluded that enhancement of the <br /> landfill gas collection system, combined with an extension of the final cover system over 1.3 <br /> acres of more recently-identified wastes that lie to the north of the closed landfill would be <br /> the most appropriate initial remedial action to mitigate the release. The existing landfill gas <br /> extraction system is highly effective at removing VOCs from the existing waste prism,though <br /> no wells have been constructed in the 1.3-acre waste area. <br />