Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Padilla <br />Page 2 of 7 <br />Findings, Item 3 should be rephrased to state, "The <br />following findings and certification are required pursuant <br />to PRC 50000.5, 44010, and 50000." <br />- Specifications, Item 2 should be rephrased to state "A <br />change that ... of this permit would be ... significant <br />change and would require... revision." <br />- Specifications, Item 3 states that the permitted capacity is <br />470 tons per day, the application states 390. Please <br />correct this discrepancy. <br />- Specifications, Item 4 should read "a new permit" not <br />"modified permit". <br />- Closure/Postclosure Maintenance, Item 1, first sentence <br />should also state 11... and CIWMB in accordance with 14 CCR <br />18255 and 18268.11 <br />Self -Monitoring, Item 2 should be deleted since no recycling <br />is occurring at the site. <br />Report of Disposal Site Information <br />Most of the information contained in the document was either <br />incomplete or vague. The RDSI made several references to other <br />documents. It is the Boards policy that the RDSI be a self - <br />sustained document. The RDSI should be rewritten or amended as a <br />"stand-alone" document and should not reference other documents. <br />My comments follow the format given in the Permit Desk Manual. <br />The bold print indicate those sections which are requirements of <br />14 CCR 18222 that were not adequately addressed. <br />(a) 1. The RDSI states that the waste is pushed and spread <br />when a sufficient amount has accumulated. 14 CCR 17677 <br />requires that the loose layer not exceed two feet <br />before compaction. <br />2. The waste classification should reflect the current <br />classification. <br />3. a. State the maximum daily load capacity of the <br />facility, and state the average daily throughput <br />expected. <br />4. Please submit a copy of the Site Development Plan for <br />review. <br />