Laserfiche WebLink
File No. 20-1008-49 KLEINFELDER <br /> December 22, 1994 <br /> permeability characteristics of single lift construction. This test pad was constructed between <br /> July 28 and August 2, 1994. Field and laboratory testing indicated the single-lift method of <br /> construction on a mixture of 20 percent Ione clay and 80 percent native borrow materials met <br /> project requirements and was approved in letters by the CRWQCB and CIWMB dated August <br /> 23 and 24, 1994, respectively. Test pad laboratory permeabilities were on the same order of <br /> magnitude as the SDRI test. The three test pad lab permeabilities were 1.4 x 10$ cm/sec, 5.0 <br /> x 10' cm/sec, and 2.0 x 10$ cm/sec; the SDRI permeability was 4.5 x 10$ cm/sec. The test <br /> pad hydrometer and Atterberg Limit test results are summarized in Table II below: <br /> TABLE H: SUMMARY OF SECOND TEST PAD RESULTS <br /> Hydrometer <br /> Test Pad Analysis Percent Plasticity Liquid <br /> Soil Description Sand Silt Clay Index Limit <br /> Red-brown <br /> clayey sandy silt 45,43 35,32 20,25 9,9 13,17 <br /> (ML) <br /> The specified degree of relative compaction for the barrier layer is 95 percent at a moisture <br /> content of 2 percent above optimum. A relative compaction on 90 percent is specified for the <br /> side slope barrier layer. The foundation layer is to be compacted to a minimum of 90 percent <br /> relative compaction at or near optimum moisture content. <br /> BORROW SOILS <br /> The borrow area was located south of the secondary site, north of the East Bay Municipal <br /> Utility District's aqueduct, and west of a PG&E transmission line. The borrow area soils were <br /> classified as red-brown silty sand (SM) and sandy silt(ML). A sample of the borrow soils was <br /> acquired by Kleinfelder prior to foundation and barrier layer construction for sieve analysis <br /> during cover construction. The sieve analysis indicated 34 and 32 percent passed the No. 200 <br /> sieve. <br /> Based on the sieve analysis and visual observations, clean sand (SP/SM) material was not <br /> present in the borrow area during cover construction. As indicated in the revised CQA plan, <br /> clean sand was not to be used for barrier layer borrow soils due to its failure to meet <br /> permeability requirements during the first test pad construction. The SM and ML borrow soils <br /> were transported by scrapers to the primary and secondary sites where additional lab testing <br /> was performed and is summarized in the section titled "Barrier Layer Construction." <br /> PRIMARY AND SECONDARY LANDFILL CONFIGURATION <br /> The primary site is located southwest of the intersection of Harney Lane and Tully Road. The <br /> secondary site is located immediately west of the primary site separated by a PG&E <br /> Copyright 1994 Kleinfelder,Inc. Page 3 of 12 <br />