Laserfiche WebLink
® CFC-12 and 1,2-Dichlopropane were not detected in MW-2 during this year. PCE was detected <br /> in concentrations below 1 ppb. The reduction of impact indicates significant reduction in impact <br /> by VOCs at MW-2. <br /> The trend analysis by Sanitas software indicates increasing trends for Turbidity, TDS, and a <br /> decreasing trend for Chloride during the first and second semester 2012 Sampling Events. <br /> The EC concentration in this well (360 mg/L) is far below the secondary maximum contaminant <br /> level (MCL) of 900 uS/cm , and indicates good water quality. TDS has also not exceeded their <br /> secondary MCL standards, which address aesthetics rather than human health issues. <br /> It is unlikely that the increasing trend in turbidity is a result of landfill activities. Siltation within the <br /> well is often the cause of an increase in turbidity that does not affect the water quality of the <br /> aquifer outside of the well. As such, turbidity is an indicator of well function and not an indicator <br /> of landfill impact to groundwater. <br /> MW-3: <br /> Groundwater samples were not collected from MW-3 during the second semester 2012 sampling <br /> event conducted on July 30, 2012 due to a lack of water required for analysis. Samples will be <br /> collected during the next sampling event if enough water is present for collection. <br /> No general water quality parameters were exceeded in MW-3 during the first semester 2012, with <br /> the exception of turbidity, which was exceeded during the first semester 2012 sampling event. <br /> Increasing trends in turbidity and total dissolved solids were noted during the first semester. The <br /> ® increase in turbidity could be due to siltation within the well that does not affect water quality of <br /> the aquifer outside of the well. As such, turbidity is an indicator of well function and not an <br /> indicator of landfill impact to groundwater. Decreasing trends in chloride were observed in MW-3 <br /> during the first semester. <br /> Two VOCs (Benzene and Toluene) were detected during the first semester 2012 sampling event. <br /> Toluene has historically been present in MW-3, so the Toluene observation during the first <br /> semester 2012 sampling event is not considered a new release. The presence of VOCs will <br /> continue to be checked for at this well during the next semiannual event. <br /> MW-4: <br /> No general water quality parameter concentration limits were exceeded in MW-4 during the first <br /> or second semester 2012 sampling events, with the exception of turbidity. <br /> An increasing trend in turbidity, pH, and TDS were observed during the first and second semester <br /> 2012 sampling events. A decreasing trend was observed for Chloride during the first and second <br /> semester 2012. <br /> No VOCs were detected during the first semester 2012 sampling event. One VOC (Acetone) was <br /> reported in MW-4 during the second semester 2012 sampling event. Prior to the second <br /> semester 2012 sampling event, VOCs were last reported during the second semester 2009 <br /> monitoring event.. Prior to the 2009 VOC detections, VOCs were last reported in this well in <br /> second semester 1999. The presence of VOCs will continue to be checked for in this well during <br /> the next semiannual event. <br /> Harney Lane Sanitary Landfill 11 Department of Public Works/Solid Waste <br /> 2nd Semester and Annual 2012 Groundwater Monitoring Report County of San Joaquin—January 25,2013 <br />