Laserfiche WebLink
Lk'Y <br /> 3 <br /> e <br /> \Pn. J . Hunter do Associates informally visited the site during <br /> the latter part of 1989 and after accepting the job of preparing <br /> this report , re-visited the site on March 14 , 1990. The photos <br /> used in Figs . 6 and 7 were taken at that time. <br /> AREA GEOLOGY AND HYDROGEOLOGY <br /> The project lies in an area that is classified in Reierer:ce I as <br /> a flood basin of the San Joaquin River , having; shallow deposits <br /> of Recent to Pleistoce" Age, of flood basin, low permeability, <br /> clay, silt , sand, gravel and sometimes organic materials. Sand <br /> content in the area is estimated to vary from 0 feet to i0 feet <br /> in the upper 50 feet of material (0 to 20 %) . The preparers; of <br /> this report did not witness either excavation and have seen only <br /> the material remaining in the spoil pile seen on Fissure 7 . the <br /> materials here, disturbed and mixed by the excavating process, <br /> appeared to be yellow colored, silty sand. <br /> The materials excavated were described by Richard Thorpe, who <br /> supervised all site operations , as tan co ored silty sand. No <br /> clays and organic materials were found, The upper 2 feet or so <br /> were probably sandy fill material covered by asphalt . <br /> at 12 feet in <br /> No groundwater was encountered during excavating, <br /> Excavation /I 1 ; however , some water entered the hole at night <br /> . and disappeared during the day, indicating some sort of tidal <br /> effect . Earth tides can be seen in some shallow water areas even <br /> when actual ocean tides are not involved. In any event , ground- <br /> water appears to be found at just below 12 feet , surface refer- <br /> ence. <br /> Inasmuch as the port deepwater channel is only about 150 feet <br /> north of the first excavation and the MSL elevation is only <br /> about plus 10 feet , water should have been encountered. Average <br /> od <br /> groundwater depth as estimated by the San Joaquin County <br /> Control District is shown on Figure S . The 1989 groundwater <br /> elevation shown for the project site is either outside or at the <br /> very perimeter of reap data. <br /> Mr. Freggiaro, Port of Stockton, reported that to his knowlede O <br /> there are no water wells within perhaps a one mile radius of the <br /> site. All water used in the Port is piped- in municipal water . <br /> Reference 0 1 shows the site to overly degraded aquifers which <br /> had a chloride content of over 300 ppm as far back as 1963. The <br /> current pumping depression of -40 feet shown northerly of the <br /> project site likely has drawn and will draw degraded water in <br /> that direction. <br /> - - - <br /> _.port i s i n a rection- <br /> naturally l_E y _l low _area_ t1-,at- a ithe r--had--_to -be - _--- <br /> The entire p - -- <br /> filled or regraded during port cartstruction: <br /> 5 <br />