Laserfiche WebLink
Chronology April 16,2010 <br /> Ernie's General Store page 2 <br /> 04/24/08 The EHD approved the Interim Soil Remediation Work Plan Addendum <br /> submitted by AGE on April 14, 2008, which proposed to change the SVE system <br /> from a Solleco ECAT 250 to a Solleco TCAT 250 which AGE stated would allow <br /> operation of the SVE system within the current electrical limitations of the site, <br /> and to save costs. AGE stated in the addendum they expected to have the <br /> remediation initiated by the end of May 2008. <br /> 05/19/08 The State Water Resources Control Board Cleanup Fund conducted a 5-year <br /> review of this site and concurred with the EHD directives to initiate active <br /> remediation by SVE. <br /> 08/19/08 The EHD notified the responsible party that the deadline to initiate the approved <br /> SVE remediation was October 24, 2008, and that failure to comply with this <br /> deadline may result in his referral to the Regional Water Quality Control Board <br /> (RWQCB) for enforcement action. <br /> 01/05/09 The EHD notified the responsible party that they had 14 days to come into <br /> regulatory compliance and initiate the approved SVE remediation, and that failure <br /> to do so may result in his referral to the RWQCB for enforcement action. <br /> 01/22/09 The responsible party failed to meet the 14-day deadline; the EHD scheduled a <br /> meeting with to discuss his history of non-compliance with regulatory directives. <br /> 02/24/09 A meeting was held at the EHD office in Stockton to discuss the recalcitrance of <br /> the responsible party in being in compliance with regulatory directives. At the <br /> meeting the responsible party said he had no funds to initiate the SVE <br /> remediation. It was discussed that he is responsible for the investigation and <br /> remediation of the contamination caused by his operation of the UST's, that he <br /> profited from those UST's and that Title 23 of the California Code of Regulations <br /> made no guarantee of eligibility to or reimbursement from the SWRCB Cleanup <br /> Fund. The responsible party was directed to submit in writing to the EHD a <br /> schedule for completing the required work at his site. <br /> 03/10/09 The responsible party submitted a letter to the EHD stating he would begin <br /> installation of the SVE system in September 2010. <br /> 03/27/09 The EHD notified the responsible party that his time schedule was not <br /> reasonable and directed him to have the SVE system in operation no later than <br /> December 31, 2009. He was also notified that failure to comply with regulatory <br /> directives may result in his referral to the RWQCB for enforcement action. <br /> 08/27/09 The EHD notified the responsible party that he was out of compliance with <br /> regulatory directives for failing to conduct routine groundwater monitoring and <br /> sampling at his site, reminding him that the deadline for the SVE remediation <br /> system to be in operation is December 31, 2009, and that if he did not comply <br /> with this deadline he may be referred to the RWQCB for enforcement action. <br />