Laserfiche WebLink
Facility and PBR Units Closure Work Plan <br /> 1848 and 1856 Field Ave., Stockton, California <br /> r <br /> 4.0 CLEANUP GOALS <br /> ` In general,we consider cleanup goals to be those levels above which further cleanup is appropriate and below <br /> which no further action is required. Given the seven issues or potential issues listed above, cleanup goals <br /> ` appear necessary for petroleum hydrocarbons, pH and copper. Cleanup goals for these chemicals were <br /> previously proposed in the Facility Closure Plan (Earth Tech, 2001). Cleanup goals for each of these <br /> chemicals are presented below. hi some circumstances, Tyco is proposing modifications to the previously <br /> proposed goals, generally making the proposed goals more stringent. <br /> rr <br /> hi the Facility Closure Plan, Tyco previously proposed a cleanup goal of 100 mg/kg for TRPH. It is our <br /> opinion that 1,000 mg/kg is actually a more appropriate cleanup goal,because the petroleum hydrocarbons <br /> released from the compressor and lamination press are relatively viscous,relatively non-toxic,and relatively <br /> immobile.MSDSs for the compressor oil and lamination press oil are attached as Appendix A. However,in <br /> order to facilitate the County review and approval process,Tyco proposes to continue to use the 100 mg/kg <br /> ` cleanup goal for TRPH.If petroleum hydrocarbon levels between 100 mg/kg and 1,000 mg/kg would result in <br /> excavation that might adversely impact building stability,Tyco reserves the right to revisit this cleanup goal <br /> ` with the County. <br /> In the Facility Closure Plan,Tyco previously proposed a cleanup goal of 76,000 mg/kg for copper in soil.This <br /> level was proposed because it was the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Region IX <br /> preliminary remediation goals(PRG)for industrial settings,considered by EPA to be a conservative estimate <br /> of acceptable residual risk for an industrial land use. Since the release ofthe Facility Closure Plan,the EPA has <br /> lowered the industrial PRG for copper to 41,000 mg/kg. In comparison,the residential PRG(for residential <br /> land uses) is 3,100 mg/kg. For further comparison, Earth Tech used equations in the DTSC's Preliminary <br /> Endangerment Assessment Guidance Manual(DTSC, 1994)to calculate the copper concentration in industrial <br /> ` soil which results in a hazard quotient of 1.0 (essentially one-in-one-million risk)and found this level to be <br /> 54,000 mg/kg. Details of this hazard quotient calculation are presented in Appendix B. To be conservative, <br /> Tyco proposes a revised cleanup goal of 3,100 mg/kg,the EPA residential PRG for copper in soil. <br /> Further, Tyco proposes the same cleanup goal, 3,100 mg/kg, for copper in concrete. This is even more <br /> conservative than the soil cleanup goal, since there are fewer exposure routes to metals in concrete in an <br /> LAWOW690991GenemlTield WPIField Ave WPAugo3.2.dx 13 August 2003 <br />