Laserfiche WebLink
• • <br /> The email from the LEA is asking AGE if they have trench logs for the work conducted. <br /> (39 <br /> AS t0the �EAgG-CR-i� j, 1114 <br /> rp,., + <br /> This email from AGE states that the area of waste "handling" is well defined by historical photos <br /> and the current"set of trench "logs" and additional trenching would be outside the areas already <br /> investigated. AGE states that north is a leve[e]I built for a flood, south is pasture land, west is <br /> the property line and power plant and east is [a] ditch with trees. They stated that the area which <br /> is covered represents the glass "management area and disposal area" maps attached. AGE <br /> referred to the attached draft trench log for the site in Lathrop and that finding of glass or debris <br /> are noted; otherwise the content of the trenches consisted of tan to brown sandy loam soil or <br /> silty loam soil, without discoloration. AGE stated that a "photo for location at Trench 11 had a <br /> thin glass cement, otherwise mostly soil cover and native." AGE said that if an inspection was <br /> required that they would be able to conduct one anytime and that it may be critical to have <br /> CalRecycle inspect for verification. <br /> Comments: What is meant by a "thin glass cement, otherwise mostly soil cover and native?" <br /> Trench logs should be submitted documenting field observations at individual locations, <br /> including the presence/absence of wastes, waste depths when present, indicating whether <br /> native soils were encountered, presence/absence of cover, and sample locations/depths. A <br /> figure should also be provided summarizing findings of the trenches. It appears that although <br /> exploratory trenching was conducted at the "waste handling" area, that based on historical aerial <br /> photographs and background information that wastes extend beyond the area that was the <br /> location of the exploratory trenches/site investigation. Draft documents typically are not <br /> submitted to regulatory agencies since these agencies typically require signed <br /> reports/documents/letter prior to their review. (An excel table of trench logs was provided as a <br /> separate document to be reviewed and may be the draft trench log.) <br /> Jtifie.3,X2015 <br /> This email response from the LEA shortly after the AGE email (above) states that it is important <br /> to remember that well defined by ones definition maybe different to someone else. Currently, <br /> CalRecycle is not so certain that i[t]s has been well defined. The LEA suggested that ground <br /> penetrating radar [GPR] be used to give a better picture and rule out any other waste that may <br /> be onsite. The LEA stated that CalRecycle was receptive to this. <br /> Comments: Typically GPR is used prior to conducting a waste disposal site investigation to <br /> assist with locating exploratory trenches to delineate the extent of wastes (as opposed to after <br /> field investigation work is conducted). Historical aerial photographs as well as background <br /> documents as early as the 1980s provide information on the suspected extent of waste disposal <br /> and about the estimated volume of wastes disposed of. Based on this information available at <br /> the time, it appears that wastes were disposed of at locations outlying the area that was <br /> investigated and that the extent of wastes was not delineated. Information to confirm that the <br /> extent of wastes on the property was delineated was not provided. <br /> Ninyo&Moore 1 500 E.Louise Avenue,Lathrop,San Joaquin County,California 1 104690095 1 August 11,2017 31 <br />