My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SR0083840_SSCRPT
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
ALPINE
>
2365
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
SR0083840_SSCRPT
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/20/2021 4:15:56 PM
Creation date
9/20/2021 4:08:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
FileName_PostFix
SSCRPT
RECORD_ID
SR0083840
PE
2603
STREET_NUMBER
2365
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
ALPINE
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205
APN
11903520
ENTERED_DATE
6/11/2021 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
2365 E ALPINE AVE
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\tsok
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
98
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
§ 3.2 Description of all past on-site potential and/or known above and/or below ground sources <br />of contamination identified on the property include: 1.) There is no record of there being <br />an above ground or underground permitted fuel storage tank(s) (ASTs/USTs) on the subject <br />property. 2.) There is an electrical transformer near the northwest corner of the property. <br />No oil leakage was observed from this transformer, as illustrated on the photographic <br />plate. <br />The predominate wind direction through the region is east-southeast. West-northwest, or <br />upgradient wind shed comes through the Altamont Pass and is illustrated on Page 30 of the <br />ERS document and does not affect the property. <br />Although DDT was banned in 1972, its presence in San Joaquin Valley soils is an <br />indication of its long half-life. It is extremely unlikely there are any concentrations of <br />DDT or its degradates in the property soils from farming operations that may have taken <br />place on the property many decades ago. Any minute residual pesticide concentrations are <br />inconsequential. <br />§ 3.3 Description of all current on-site potential and/or known above ground and below ground <br />sources of contamination identified at the project site are included in Section 3.2. No <br />sources of current aboveground contamination were observed, other than the referenced <br />non -hazardous items described in Section 5 of this report. <br />§ 3.4 Description of all past off-site potential and/or known above and below ground sources of <br />contamination identified in the area of the project site that could impact the site include: <br />Information conveyed by the ERS documents indicate no listings, with no likelihood of <br />impact to the property from a distant contaminated site. The GeoTracker document <br />illustrates one listing within 1,000 ft radius from the property, which has "completed - case <br />closed" designation. <br />Agricultural spray drift affecting the property from the nearest agricultural production land <br />is an extremely slight possibility, since agricultural production occurs 2,000 feet to the <br />northwest. <br />§ 3.5 Descriptions of all current off-site potential and/or known above and below ground <br />sources of contamination identified in the area of the project site include those referenced <br />in Sections 3.2, 3.3, and 3.4 above. Any contaminated sites can be considered "past" off- <br />site sources of contamination that are simultaneously "current" contaminated sources. <br />Chesney Consulting <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.