Laserfiche WebLink
'.' <br />exceed an hourly average of 45 dBa during the nighttime or 55 dBa during the daytime, then <br />setbacks and a limitation on hours of operations shall be mandatory. As recommended in the <br />Forward, Inc. Landfill Use Permit Modifications, the option of a soundwall at 9690 Austin <br />Road shall be available to the resident. <br />(PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY> <br />(7) 36 (E.5) <br />Identified in EIR: <br />The landfill operator shall submit an updated post-closure permit application for WMU-A that <br />presents plans to prohibit the expansion of the new landfill areas above WMU-A. The <br />applicant filed a renewal of its hazardous waste permit forWMU-A on October 31,2000 <br />(Kleinfelder, 2000) that presents the controls and monitoring o(WMU-A. The appllcani's JTD <br />describes creating a wedge of landfill material north of WMU-A that would keep a buffer area <br />around the WMU-A boundaries clear of new refuse and then start to build outward and <br />upward. This plan must have the approval of the CIWMB and RWQCB. <br />(BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES) <br />(8) 61 (H.2) <br />Identified in EIR: <br />Night lighting with sodium lamps with sharp cutoff angles shall be used to focus light in active <br />landfill areas (target areas) and to avoid nighttime lighting of adjacent open areas and trees. <br />(9) 66 Austin 1994 (F2.a) (similar), Austin 2000 (F2.a) <br />Under current project plans, 31 of the 32 valley oaks are along the perimeter of/he site or are <br />in the deSignated wildlife preseNe adjacent to the creek and would not be removed. <br />(10) 67 Austin 1994 (F2.b) (similar), Austin 2000.(F2.b) <br />Prior to initiation of any activity within a 100-foot radius of a valley oak proposed for retention, <br />the project proponent shall install clearly visible temporary fencing around the dripline of the <br />Valley oak to prevent inadvertent damage during on-site activities. Fencing shall be removed <br />upon completion of activity within the oak's vicinity. Site workers shall be advised of the <br />sensitivity of on-site oaks to disturbance. <br />(11) 68 Austin 1994 (F2.c) (similar), Austin 2000 (F2.c) <br />Where avoidance of a valleyoak(s) as specified above is determined infeasible, the project <br />proponent shall replace each oak as required by the County's Natural Resources <br />Regulations: three oaks shall be planted in appropriate locations for each oak removed. <br />Replacement trees shall be the same species as the removed trees. Replacement trees <br />shall be planted on the site in association with the Wetland Mitigation and Monitoring Plan <br />described above. <br />(12) 69 Austin 1994 (F2.d) (similar), Austin 2000 (F2.d) <br />To ensure the success of mitigation, planted and retained trees shall be monitored for a <br />period of five years following initial disturbance within the vicinity of a retained tree or <br />following planting of a replacement tree. If, during the course of monitoring, a sIgnificant <br />decline in the health of planted or retained trees is identified by a qualified arborist, the tree <br />shall be replaced as described above. <br />(13) 70 Austin 1994 (F3.a) (similar), Austin 2000 (similar) (F3.a) <br />Of the 219 acres disturbed, a 10.5 -acre wildlife preseNe and floodplain will be retained as <br />foraging habitat. <br />San Joaquin County <br />Community Development <br />UP-00-7, ER-00-2IForward, Inc. <br />Page 3