Laserfiche WebLink
rM <br />State of California <br />April 5, 1983 <br />Page Two <br />TABLE 1 <br />DRILLING MUD ANALYSIS <br />E.C. <br />Est. <br />T.D.S. <br />Chrome <br />(total) <br />(micro-mhos/cm) <br />(Mg <br />/ L) <br />(mg <br />/ L) <br />Discharge Strip 430 275 <br />Mud 0.037 <br />Water (Extract) 0.027 <br />West Pond 120 77 <br />Mud 0.015 <br />Water (Extract) 0.008 <br />East Pond 120 77 <br />Mud 0.008 <br />Water (Extract) 0.008 <br />A copy of the Certified Chemical Analysis will be forwarded <br />to your office under separate cover. If you wish, sample splits <br />can also be provided for comparative analysis in a separate <br />laboratory. <br />Based upon the results shown in Table 1, my client assumed <br />this material would be classified as harmless waste consisting of <br />inert bentonite clay mixed with water of excellent quality. It <br />was felt that there was no potential adverse impact to either <br />surface or ground water. In addition, the drilling mud is odor- <br />less and offers no potential to create a nuisance. <br />In view of the above we would ask that you reconsider your <br />demand that the material be removed from the site. <br />If there is further information that you require please feel <br />free to call. <br />Yours very truly, <br />NOMELLINI & GRILLI <br />PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATIONS <br />DANT JOHN NOMELLINI <br />Attorney at Law <br />DJN/rf <br />cc: Lee Hall, San Joaquin Local Health Department <br />Terry Dermody, San Joaquin County Counsel Office <br />Foothill Sanitary Landfill, Inc. <br />