Laserfiche WebLink
PC : 9-17-87 <br /> TA-88-2 <br /> The following provisions of the Planning Title are affected by <br /> the proposed Text Amendment : <br /> 1 . Deletion of one-year time limit to determine an infraction or <br /> misdemeanor under enforcement procedures . <br /> 2 . Elimination of sections placing time limits on processing <br /> staff review, public hearing, and appeal items , since these <br /> time limits are already set forth in State law. <br /> 3 . Broadening of the Revocation of Use Permit section to include <br /> revocation procedures for any discretionary permit . <br /> 4 . Modification of review procedures for routine applications <br /> from Staff Review With Notice to Staff Review. Application <br /> types affected are Accessory Mobilehomes , Home Occupations , <br /> Private Rights-of-Way, and Second Unit Dwellings . <br /> 5 . Modification of the zoning requirement for property in an <br /> agricultural preserve . Under the existing ordinance , all <br /> property within an agricultural preserve must be zoned to at <br /> least EA-20 or GA-20 . Under the proposed Text Amendment , <br /> property within an agricultural preserve could carry an <br /> agricultural zoning classification. This change would elimi- <br /> nate the need for the County to serve Notices of Nonrenewal <br /> on the owners of Williamson Act properties that are zoned <br /> GA-1 , GA-5 , GA-10 , EA-5 , EA-10, or I-PA. (For example, in <br /> the Escalon area, there are over 10 , 000 acres in agricultural <br /> preserve zoned GA-10. Of this total , 3400 acres are under <br /> contract . Under existing requirements, it would be necessary <br /> for the County to serve Notices of Nonrenewal on the owners <br /> of these 3400 acres. ) The change would also allow preserves <br /> and contracts to be established or maintained in areas pro- <br /> posed for AL-5 or AL-10 zoning. The critical issue here is <br /> not whether a particular agricultural zone is appropriate <br /> but whether the property under contract is sufficiently large <br /> to sustain an agricultural use. In this regard, the minimun <br /> parcel size of 10 acres specified for property under contract <br /> In the Planning Title would remain unchanged. This size <br /> requirement reflects State requirements for parcels under <br /> contract. <br /> 6 . A complete revision and reorganization of Chapter 3, Division <br /> 3 : Zone Classification and Text Change. This is a proce- <br /> dural chapter describing the naming of zones; the adoption, <br /> update , and revision of zoning maps ; as well as boundary <br /> interpretations. These sections have been reformatted to <br /> simplify and clarify their intent . There has been no <br /> substantive change. <br /> -5- <br />