My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_WARRANT RETURN OF INSPECTION 10/28/2002
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
S
>
SANTA FE
>
23023
>
4400 - Solid Waste Program
>
PR0504907
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_WARRANT RETURN OF INSPECTION 10/28/2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/13/2024 4:01:33 PM
Creation date
8/30/2022 1:56:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4400 - Solid Waste Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
WARRANT RETURN OF INSPECTION 10/28/2002
RECORD_ID
PR0504907
PE
4430
FACILITY_ID
FA0006398
FACILITY_NAME
SNYDERS SANITARY
STREET_NUMBER
23023
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
SANTA FE
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
ESCALON
Zip
95320
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
23023 S SANTA FE RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\cfield
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
409
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 Health Division said groundwater in this area is 20 feet. Mr. <br />2 Padilla noted in the Activity/Action Log notes that water wells <br />3 in the City of Riverbank first groundwater is 63 feet. <br />4 On January 4, 1990, an Office Hearing was held. The <br />5 following were present at this hearing: Mr. Lane and two of his <br />6 lawyers; Thomas Sweeso from the County Valley Unified Air <br />7 Pollution Control District; David Irey, District Attorney; Jim <br />8 Miller and Ed Padilla from Public Health Services, Environmental' <br />9 Health Division. The Pre-trial date was posted until January 1, <br />10 1990. Mr. Irey told Bill Lane that all hazardous wastes and <br />11 refuse must be removed from the site, but the dirt could stay. <br />12 Concrete and asphalt was still questionable as whether it needed <br />13 to be removed. Mr. Sweeso said there may be drainage problems <br />14 due to large amounts of added material to the site. Mr. Padilla <br />15 pointed out there may be groundwater contamination and possible <br />16 landfill gas migration. Mr. Lane said he could not afford to <br />17 clean up the property; however, he did not deny that he received <br />18 gate fees of at least $12,000 to dump at his illegal landfill. <br />19 On January 4, 1991, Ed Padilla agreed to meet with Bill <br />20 Lane and his lawyers at the illegal dump site to evaluate the <br />21 clean-up process. <br />22 On January 15, 1991, a meeting was held with District <br />23 Attorney David Irey, Ed Padilla, Thomas Sweeso, Bill Lane and <br />24 his lawyers. It was agreed that no new evidence was admissible <br />25 for the Pre-trial. No new evidence or photographs were found <br />26 except for Mr. Lane's lawyer. Mr. Irey asked for a report <br />27 stating what should be done on the clean-up at the Subject <br />28 <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.