Laserfiche WebLink
CO2400614 <br /> 1000 E. Roth Rd. French Camp, CA 95213 <br /> 12/28/24—Phase 3 of Clean-up <br /> Incident Narrative: <br /> EHD arrived on site at approximately 8:15am. GrayMar and Arcadis were already on-site. GrayMar <br /> had just started to double-bag the vegetation they had removed the day prior. Evan from Arcadis <br /> who was overseeing the cleanup reported a slight drop in the flow of water in the retention pond. <br /> Absorbent pads were applied in shallow areas where sheen was observed.The plan for the day <br /> primarily consisted of vegetation removal and removing sheen in areas where water had dropped. <br /> GreyMar began using the vac truck to skim shallow puddles.When asked if any sheen had been <br /> absorbed into the soil of the retention pond when the water dropped, Evan stated he could not say <br /> if it had or had not. EHD expressed concerns about the soil and discussed with Lead Sr. Haza <br /> Saeed. Haza advised to check with Scott Hackman of Arcadis to see if there was a plan to address <br /> the soil of the pond or establish a historical baseline. <br /> EHD took photos of the paved area of the train yard where the fire occurred. Large dark stains were <br /> observed that appeared oily.When asked if further clean-up was planned for that area,Arcadis <br /> stated they considered that portion of the clean-up completed. Evan stated they had swept of the <br /> burnt debris that remained. EHD expressed concerns about the stains and their oily appearance <br /> and Evan stated he would check with his team. <br /> Evan reported the plan for the day was only vegetation removal and they were awaiting additional <br /> supplies to speed the process, and that cleanup would continue Monday. EHD departed the <br /> cleanup and planned to return for final cleanup. <br /> Evan called at approximately 1:30pm and reported that they were shifting their focus from the south <br /> end of the pond where there was just a narrow stream of water to the north end of the pond where <br /> the two feet of standing water was. He stated they would place a hard boom at the end of the pond <br /> and use absorbent booms to corral the sheen to a central location where they would skim it off the <br /> top of the pond with the vac truck. He reported that they also planned to power wash the paved <br /> area where staining was observed before they finished for the day. <br /> Evan called at 7pm and reported that they had completed power washing the paved area but that <br /> the booms had not contained the sheen in the pond as they had hoped.When asked if he knew why <br /> he stated that they were made to contain oil slicks, not sheen. He reported that they were wrapping <br /> up for the day and would be back on site tomorrow for a brief field assessment to observe and take <br /> photos but that no cleanup would occur. He also reported that Scott Hackman planned to meet <br /> with Union Pacific on Monday morning and based on the day's events and tomorrow's observations <br /> they would come up with a plan to address the retention pond and update us by 10am on Monday. <br /> Evan sent photos of the site at the end of the days cleanup and reported that 51 bags of vegetation, <br /> 2 bags of absorbent, 200 gallons of sheen water, and 50 gallons of rinse water from pressure <br /> washing had been generated. In the photo,the paved area was still wet from power washing and <br /> staining could not be assessed. EHD will confirm adequacy of cleanup at next site visit. <br />